A waste of time , and dollars: Sharks of the Corn (2021) picture critique.

Wiki Article

Are you up for an adrenaline-pumping ride through shark-infested cornfields? Put on your seat, because "Sharks of the Corn" promises sensational horror as well as comedy. Created by the legendary Tim Ritter, this ultra low-budget movie draws its inspiration from Stephen King's masterpiece "Children of the Corn" (1984) as it transforms into a hilarious, bizarre mockumentary that will have you thinking about it and rolling around on the floor having a good time.

An Cornfield Carnival of Chaos

From the very first moment in the seemingly normal cornfield "Sharks of the Corn" introduces its quirky nature. We are introduced to Gary and Susan, two characters who gradually fade out of the picture as the film takes away in unexpected directions. The plot combines horror elements and numerous subplots. It's a pleasing combination that can best be described as a cornfield carnival full of craziness.

A Psychoopathic Shark Enthusiast

Then there's Teddy Bo Lucas, a name that gives an added dimension of absurdity to an already fascinating story. The psychopathic shark lover has an uncanny fascination with these underwater predators. If sharks in cornfields were not enough of a bizarre sight, Teddy takes his obsession to another level when you witness him commit an unimaginable murder within his hotel room. A shocking twist in the story sets the stage to a frenzy of suspense and intrigue.

There is confusion. Cults as well as Sharks

It gets even more complicated when the authorities place the blame on the poor Gary to be the culprit in Susan's death, regardless of his motive. In the meantime, a shark cult appears as a bizarre subplot. We are introduced to this world where cornfields, and the cult of sharks collide. And just when you think that it's impossible to imagine anything more outrageous the two burglars who are bumbling decide to steal a baby shark from the clan. The show is a mix of humor and horror that will keep you on your toes.

Critiques and Comic Relief

Although "Sharks of the Corn" has a refreshing and distinctive entertainment, Sharks of the Corn it's certainly not without imperfections. The movie frequently leaps between diverse characters and scenes making some viewers feel lost in a struggle to comprehend the numerous plotlines. It's a clever stylistic decision that contributes to the spoof aspect of the film but it's not everyone's cup of tea.

Production values for the movie are consciously low and the acting falls into the realm of questionable. The film is nevertheless amidst a sea of subpar performances Steve Guynn shines through with his outstanding performance. He is acting as his character, not merely reciting sentences. It's an exceptional example of true acting in a sea of over-the-top performances.

Shark Puppets and Bonkers Plotlines

"Sharks of the Corn" shows its low-budget inclination with simple effects with some charm. Most shark attacks are hilariously portrayed by hand puppets. The effect adds some humour to the film. Its bizarre plot, centred around a cult of sharks' plan for reviving a legendary shark goddess This is where the film truly unleashes its creativity. This creativity, however, often fails to translate (blog) into an thrilling viewer experience.

Amateurish Cinematography, Explosions Optional

One area where "Sharks of the Corn" has a problem is in the cinematography. The visuals and framing come appear amateurish and lack quality and refinement that's typically seen on mainstream horror films. While this could be an intentional decision for the sake of keeping a low-budget style this does affect the quality of the experience.

The conclusion is that "Sharks of the Corn" can be described as a taste that is not for everyone. It's slow and boring hodgepodge of scenes that can become difficult to discern the significance of. Film's low production standards, confusing plotlines, and the questionable performances could put off people looking for a more smooth horror/comedy. While there are plenty of poor films for entertainment "Sharks of the Corn" does not deliver laughter that you'd expect.

Final Rating Final Rating: One "Stock Footage Overlay" Out of Five

with its poor-quality video, recording, acting and editing skills "Sharks of the Corn" doesn't quite hit the quality. Despite the potential for a fantastically fun spoof film it ultimately fails to deliver a coherent and enjoyable user experience. As a critic, I concluding with a humorous note: movies, like corn are best with explosions. Unfortunately, "Sharks of the Corn" isn't quite up to the cut.

Report this wiki page